Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Response to ‘Disposable People’ by Kevin Bales

Response to ‘Disposable People’ by Kevin Bales
Created by: Shannon Campbell
June 24, 2013


Part I
Summary:
Millions of people throughout the world are un-employed, starving, and homeless. Hard labor is only rewarded with a few coins. Young children are forced to do extraneous labor instead of being sent to school, but yet none of this is considered to be any form of slavery. Many people do not know the difference between old and new slavery…and even more do not know that there is a new slavery altogether.  Kevin Bales, the author of Disposable People, has created a simple yet complex collection of documents and stories of five countries; Thailand, Mauritania, Brazil, Pakistan, and India and their role in today’s new slavery.
Bales directly spoke with many of the people involved in the new slave trade, in whom he calls “disposable”. This is a new idea, with differences varying between old and new slavery. The people he spoke to ranged from brothel owners, to prostitutes, to brick-makers. However, despite of the role they played, they all were involved in the new slave trade. And ultimately, we are too, indulging in the many products that they are forced to create that are being sold throughout the world.

Chapter 1: Introduction
Bales introduces, “Disposable People”, with describing the current state of slavery in today’s society.  “My best estimate of the number of slaves in the world today is 27 million”, states Bales (Bales 8). He then goes onto describing what the differences of slavery is today compared to that of many decades and centuries ago. Old slavery focuses on legal ownership being asserted, high purchase costs, low profits, shortage of potential slaves, long-term relationships, slave maintenance, and ethnic differences (Bales 15). New slavery focuses on legal ownership being avoided, very low purchase costs, very high profits, glut of potential slaves, short-term relationships, slaves being “disposable”, and ethic differences not being important.
With new slavery, there are differences between the three main kinds that are going on currently and globally. Chattel slavery is most comparable to the old form of slavery (Bales 19). This is when a slave is either captured, born into, or sold into a permanent form of servitude. This type of slavery is found in both northern and western Africa, as well as Arab countries such as Mauritania. Debt bondage is the second form of slavery, which is focused on a financial burden, such as a loan. This form of slavery can be found in Pakistan and India. And lastly, contract slavery is enforced through “modern labor relations”. Ultimately, this hides slavery, and can be found in Southeast Asia, Brazil, a few Arab States, and India. Together, these three types of new slavery generate $13 billion dollars annually (Bales 23).

Chapter 2: Thailand
The overheads are low, the turnover high, and the profits immense” (Bales 53). Bales uses this quote to describe the current slave trade in Thailand, which includes a massive use of prostitution among female youth. “Thai children, especially girls, owe their parents a profound debt” (Bales 39). Brothels are spread across the city, with 35,000 young girls living in them, paying back debt to both their parents and pimps (Bales 43). Nearly a half of a million prostitutes are for service, including these young girls. Bales explains that the reason why it is so popular is because of their Thai and religious Hindu culture. Nearly 80-87% of Thai men have gone to a brothel in Thailand, regardless of their religion (Bales 45). With any sort of celebratory excuse, alcohol goes hand in hand with getting a prostitute for a night for these men. The brothel owners make an incredible amount of profit, with many employees depending on them.
Religion, once again, also plays a role in this process, with the Hindu religion supporting the idea of children owing debt to their parents. Previous lives are also included in the ideology, with sinners coming back to their present life due to poor actions in their past.

Chapter 3: Mauritania
Mauritania is one of the few countries in the world who practice slavery and still bases the practice off of one’s race. Chattel slavery is what is named, although it has been ‘officially” abolished by the government, most recently in 1980. However, “religion serves both to protect slaves and keep them in bondage”, similar to those enslaved in Thailand (Bales 85). Compared to old slavery, which Bales points out in the first chapter, Mauritania is one of the few countries that also practice a form of slavery that is similar to old slavery besides with associating it with race. Slaves in Mauritania have relatively high purchase costs, high profits, long-term relationships with their slaveholders, as well as having decent maintenance by their slaveholders (Bales 118). 
There is some light being shed on the situation, with the organizations of SOS Slaves and El Hor working to help slaves into freedom (Bales 120). However, like many of the countries that Bales mentions, slavery is still an everyday practice.

Chapter 4: Brazil:
In Brazil, slavery has had a historic role in the founding’s of the country. Natives of Brazil were enslaved by Portugal, in addition to African slaves being shipped from their homeland to Brazil. Today, although many things have changed regarding their infrastructure and culture, the treatment of the slaves has not. Beginning in the middle of the 20thcentury, Brazil and its forests were being taken over by industrialized companies such as Nestle and Volkswagen. Gatos, who are in charge of the slaves, scam them and promise food, decent wages, and sporadic visits to see their families. However, none of this is true, and many receive black lung disease from the charcoal camps (Bales 129).            
Slavery is what is happening right here to us. We’re enslaved here……I was told that I would be paid 2 reais per load. But I get nothing. According to the gato all the work I do just covers the cost of my good and my debt” (Bales 135).
The above passage explains the false promises made to many of the enslaved workers by the gatos. It’s a never ending cycle that continuously imprisons Brazilians into debt.

Chapter 5: Pakistan
Pakistan’s major industry is hand made bricks, where 7,000 kilns produce 2 million bricks annually. Nearly 750,000 people are involved, which include many children, as well as grown men and women. The peshgi system of debt bondage is hundreds, if not thousands of years old in Pakistan (Bales 165). The families that are involved in brick-making are paid very little, and debt bondage soon takes into effect, affecting their families for generations to come. However, compared to many other slavery-based countries, the per capita income is $450, and families still can afford “sufficient food and leisure time” (Bales 185).

Chapter 6: India
There are nearly twenty million people who fall under debt bondage in India, making it worse than Pakistan because “ there is no piece rate and interest is payable on debts” (Bales 199). Koliya, their agricultural system, is existent in the country, and is very long-lasting and vast. Many do not know of the jewelry, precious stones, bricks, timber, stone sugar, fireworks, cloth, rugs are produced by the millions of bonded laborers in India (Bales 198). India denies that no debt bondage exists, and because of the many indigenous tribes, it does make it hard to distinguish the different types of debt bondage occurring. However, consumers throughout the world purchase the products the slaves make, with little knowledge of the debt bondage being hidden within.

Chapter 7: What Can Be Done?
Bales explains in the last chapter about “what can be done” to change the different forms of slavery he explains through his findings. He begins with explaining with three key factors that has morphed old slavery, into the new slavery that is being practiced today (Bales 231).
The factor Bales explains first is that there was a massive explosion in the population throughout the world, which caused labor markets to attract millions of poor people in need of work.
Poor farmers have been displaced with economic globalization and modernized agriculture, thus making them incredibly vulnerable to enslavement.
Lastly is the “chaos of greed, violence, and corruption created by the economic change in developing countries”, which ultimately ravishes through traditional ways of life, and twisting the social norms. 
Slavery is a business, and Bales states in order to stop it is to be “putting our money where our mouth is”, however, we are still not changing our buying behavior.
Human rights workers are risking their lives in order to make a difference in this dilemma. Bales ends his novel with, “What good is our economic and political power, if we can’t use it to free slaves? If we can’t choose to stop slavery, how can we say that we are free?” (Bales 262).
Like Bales mentions before, it is necessary for his readers to learn, join with others who want to stop slavery, and act. 
_______________________________________________________________________
Part II
Opinion:
“Disposable People” was a book I heard about throughout my studies but never got around to actually reading it. I am an International Trade and Marketing major, and I learn about human trafficking sporadically throughout my studies. I mostly hear about sex trafficking, especially with young women in Thailand and Bangladesh. However, real-life human slavery seems to be a topic that is rarely discussed. After reading Disposable People, it is now clear to me why; slavery is being hidden by countries, and takes a true and passionate investigator to really dig deep and find out the facts and statistics behind the ordeal. 

Strengths:
Beginning with Bales writing style, he writes both an incredibly captivating yet extremely detailed account of newslavery. During his introduction, he gives enough facts and statistics to keep the book flowing; but not nearly to any extent of being monotonous.When diving into the different countries of the world that are engaged in slavery, it was realistic to hear about the stories of the people Bales encountered rather than to simply hear a general overview. The flow of his words and language gave a “chilling” feel when telling the stories of those who have been, or still a part of new slavery. After going through each country and their take on new slavery, he organized all of the factors and pieces of information in a coherent and concise way, almost like mathematics.  I truly think he is an abolitionist in today’s global anti-slavery movement of nearly twenty-seven million people. As he goes from the brothels of Thailand to the brick-making kilns of Pakistan, he investigates every crack and crevice. He shows the historical, cultural, and politics behind modern slavery, yet remains neutral on his personal feelings and emotions.

Weaknesses:
Personally, I would have enjoyed more stories from the civilians in the countries that Bales investigated.  I would have also liked to hear more history, although he did include enough to back up what he was explaining in today’s society. For example, when explaining his encounter with Seba, I would have liked to have an understanding on the slavery issues in France over the past few decades, not just that it is happening today. Overall those are my personal preferences, and I truly don’t have a lot to argue against both Bales topic of choice and how he portrayed it. 
Overall, I enjoyed Disposable People and would recommend the novel to anyone who is interested in global studies, world issues, international trade, or just for a good read!
Works Cited:
Bales, Kevin. Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 2004. Print.

Part II: Examples of Planned Obsolescence





By: Shannon Campbell
Part II: Examples of Planned Obsolescence
June 24, 2013
            

Examples of planned obsolesence can be seen in a variety of products. TheEconomist.com states that one of the first planned obsolescence items was the nylon stocking. The laddering of the stocking rips after a few uses and drove away manufacturers from finding a new fiber that would better suit the purpose because of the easy profit. However, most fashion garments, especially in fast-fashion stores, do have some sort of built-in obsolescence in their construction, whether it is because of its fiber content or not.  
            But planned obsolescence doesn’t apply to just fashion, it can really mold into itself into any kind of item falls within its definition. Most notably, computers fall into its category because of software constantly being updated to new versions. Usually, the old version can only used with old devices. However the new version is compatible with all of the older versions, but not vice-versa. Companies such as Intel are the number one perpetrators of this crime; they begin working on their new versions of PC chips before they even release their last version of said chip. Other examples include products like ink cartridges, which are incredibly expensive yet cheap to make (Howard). Many have smart chips that will not let the other ink work if that cartridge runs out. And the list continues, with products such as video games are never compatible with other systems (such as using a Playstation 2 disc with a Nintendo 64 game machine), which is similar to the example of software products. 
            Companies do know when planned obsolescence should be intact or not. Especially when consumers have the option to resist a product, a new demo or version should not be in stores every other month.  TheEconomist.com gives the example of the automobile. A car is an investment and people are not willing to trade in their car if a simple part needs to be fixed. Thus, the industry usually just makes cosmetic changes to their models and making the older versions seem extremely outdated and undesirable. However, luxury and antique cars and products do not fall into this category. Many collectors items are unused and preserved for future profit, thus making the idea of planned obsolescence irrelevant.

Part I: Definition & Argument of Planned Obsolescence

Part I: Definition & Argument of Planned Obsolescence

By: Shannon Campbell
Part I: Definition & Argument of Planned Obsolescence
June 23, 2013
            So, what is planned obsolesence? According to Dictionary.com, “it is a method of stimulating consumer demand by designing products that wear out or become outmoded after limited use”. It’s noted that planned obsolescense is a business strategy, and built from the conception of the product by its developers.  According to TheEconomist.com, many consumers see planned obsolescence as a “sinister plot”. But Philip Kotler, an economist, argues, “much so-called planned obsolescence is the working of the competitive and technological forces in a free society—forces that lead to ever-improving goods and services.” The debate of planned obsolescence can really be looked at both ways. With one side arguing that is both a waste of resources and consumer spending, and the other side arguing that it is good for our economy and technological advances, we must further examine the specifics to identify which argument wins. Or…..is it ultimately up to the consumer to know more about what they are buying?

Thursday, January 1, 2015

"The Hell of American Day Care"




"The Hell of American Day Care"
Topic Response: Government Regulation in America’s Day-Care System
By: Shannon Campbell
May 22, 2013


I think anyone’s initial thought when reading this article is an unbelievable trail of disbelief. As for myself, I was even more in shock in that I was never put through a child-care system, thus making me completely uniformed about the conditions and statistics behind the business. I say business in that many of the firms that seem to be in “trouble” are private day-cares, like “Jackie’s Day-Care”, which is the main focus of the article. The story of the fire was absolutely heartbreaking, but what is even more tragic about it is that it was 100% preventable.

When reading the final sentences of the article, I couldn’t belief about the trauma that the mothers had to go through when receiving the message about their children and their young lives being lost. When I think of the word day-care, I immediately think of safety and security.

The American government, compared to France, is completely lacking in the childcare department. France treats their childcare with absolute dedication, yet the United States is turning their back when it comes to any type of childcare wrongdoings. With many government-sponsored programs, it seems that childcare is the last piece to the puzzle, yet that piece still seems to not fit. Although Obama has passed an act to invest more in the system, there is still a lack of knowledge and action going towards the system. And once this money is granted, who is to say that corruption will still not occur? Government officials can easily be paid off by unlicensed childcare workers; especially when it comes to meaningless fines. The safety and security of these facilities need to be more closely monitored, especially in urban areas with higher crime and poverty. As for the case with Jessica Tata, justice was served, but it still doesn’t stop all of the other childcare imposters that are repeating the same crime.

It’s noted that 40% of children spend their week at a day care. And this period is an incredibly influential and important time in a child’s life. It is even more especially true in the case of a not so great home life that the day-care plays an even higher role. It is where children learn to interact, create their personality, and develop the necessary skills to transition into the next phase of the early years. According to the National Institute of Child Health Development, they deemed the majority of childcare and day care operations to be either fair or poor. Childcare officials have little to no training, and actual childcare workers that are provided by the government barely make an annual income of $20,000. With millions of dollars being spent on international relations, domestic issues can easily be taken care of by giving the proper pay necessary for more workers to be employed by the government. It is noted that the military childcare facilities are best recognized by having all of the right ingredients; so why wouldn’t it be just as easy to expand this project?

Day-care can be an incredible financial burden to families, especially in a single mother case, like the many that put their children in Jackie’s Day-Care. Although there are many great assistance programs the U.S. government provides to low-income family situations, the small assistance reward that is in place now just isn’t cutting it. For a single mother who gets paid minimum wage, or even a bit higher, nearly 40% of their paycheck will go towards looking after their child.

So what is really needed to improve childcare in the United States? According to official website of the Office of Child Care, it is the parent or guardian’s choice to choose the best possible setting for their child to be taken care of in. I also think this is true; I believe it is the parent’s responsibility to do their research into finding what place is most reputable and affordable for their individual situation. As for people such as Jessica Tata, there needs to be more rules and regulations that go behind licensing a childcare facility or worker. And these rules and regulations should also be enforced in the kind of facility that is being run. That is there should be a certain kind of physical structure with the proper personnel to handle the size of the facility and how many children there are. For example, for every three children, their should be one licensed caregiver, and so on and so forth. Although many parents become desperate in situations like Jackie’s Day-Care, there are many resources to do the proper research, such as the Internet, through schools and also religious affiliations. And hopefully, within the next few years, the missing piece of childcare to the puzzle of the United States will finally fit.

The Children's Organic Company Advertisement


What is the SBA?



Official Website: http://www.sba.gov/
Created by: Shannon Campbell
February 1, 2013

What is the SBA?:

The SBA, which stands for the U.S. Small Business Administration, was founded on July 30, 1953. The SBA is an independent agency of the U.S. federal government that helps both protect and defend the rights of small businesses, which consists of counseling and assisting. The SBA has also delivered a consistent amount of financial aid, which includes loans, loan guarantees, and contracts. According to their official website, the SBA’s overall goal is to ‘preserve free competitive enterprise and to maintain and strengthen the overall economy of our nation’.

Early History:
The SBA, however, has roots that go far beyond the early 1950’s. The RFC, which stands for The Reconstruction Finance Corporation, was created by Herbert Hoover in 1932. Hoover was president of the United States during the early days of the Great Depression, and created the RFC to help ease the financial crisis for both small and large businesses going on at the time. When Franklin Delano Roosevelt won the presidency in 1933, he continued the program with the most elite of staff. This also continued into WWII, where many industries, especially those on the larger end, built up their businesses to help with the war-time efforts. Small businesses at the time simply could not compete, and The Smaller War Plants Corporation, or the SWPC, was implemented by Congress. The SWPC began giving more direct loans, as well as making credit more readily available to smaller businesses.
Although the SWPC faded out post-WWII, The Office of Small Business, or the OSB, took the responsibilities of the agency. The OSB added more of an education approach to the development and progress of small enterprises. During the Korean War, The Small Defense Plants Administration (SDPA) was created with the similar duties of the SWPC.
The RFC was eventually eliminated in 1952, and Dwight Eisenhower proposed the creation of the SBA.

1953 to Present:
When Congress passed Dwight Eisenhower’s proposal, they ensured that small businesses would be treated fairly along with larger industries in the United States.
In 1954, the SBA began distributing loans to small businesses who were victims of natural disasters, along with helping them with new technology and training.
In 1958, The Investment Company Act created The Small Business Investment Company or SBIC to help with licensing for private operated investment firms, as well as providing equity investments for small businesses that may be high-risk. This was done because the Federal Reserve saw that small businesses were unable to receive the proper credit in order to keep up with the fast technological times. A few years later, the Equal Opportunity Loan was also created.
As stated above, a variety of programs have been created by the SBA to help small businesses and their owners not only compete with larger industries, but to help stay afloat in an unpredictable economy. It has even added a special program to help small businesses with international trade. With the variety of assistance programs the SBA offers, it is a vital association that is well valued by the United States and its people. 

The Future of Britain & The European Union




The Future of Britain & The European Union
Created by: Shannon Campbell
February 8, 2013


Samantha Conti writes for WWD yesterday about the recent meeting between U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister David Cameron. The two were on a quick and brief tour of Europe, where they discussed an array of topics. However, they did not talk about, how Conti puts it, “the elephant in the room”, which translates to “Britain’s future in the European Union. Biden also met with leaders from Germany and France as well to discuss a variety of other global issues, which included the possibility of free-trade agreement between the United States and the many countries of Europe. The  British newspapers stated that nothing was mentioned about a referendum that could have Britain quitting the European Union.

Late last month Cameron bowed to pressures from a faction inside his own Conservative party, from an anti-EU political party, and from a general feeling among much of the population that everyday life in the U.K. is being eroded by the debts, the red tape and the sometimes nonsensical rules that come with being a member of the EU.” 
Cameron stated that a new negotiation would be settled with Britain and the EU if he was reelected in 2015. This proposition would include the British citizens to decide whether they want to be a part of, or disconnect themselves, from the European Union.
As for the fashion world, many British-based fashion retailers, such as Marks & SpencerBurberry, and Arcadia, are not speaking on the matter.

Nick Hood, head of external affairs at Company Watch, the London-based firm that analyzes the financial health of businesses, states the following:
 “There are an awful lot of British retailers that are talking up plans for international expansion — Debenhams, Marks & Spencer, Topshop and Reiss, to name a few — and Cameron’s speech poses serious questions because of the uncertainty it createsHow will the negotiations with the EU turn out? What will happen to the exchange rate of the poundIf Britain leaves the EU, how powerful will it be to negotiate bilateral agreements on its ownWill Britain go the route of Switzerland and Norway? Business leaders are working hard to be as neutral as possible on the subject,” Hood added.

The British Retail Consortium, which is Britain’s largest retail lobby, quoted that they are aware of the many uncertainties that this possible legislation creates. But, what is most important, is that the retail stores and businesses continue to make decisions to promote investment and jobs. John Miln, who is the CEO of the U.K. Fashion and Textile Association, stated that he and the UKFTA, “Are clearly concerned that the U.K. should remain part of Europe, and that the original principle of the common European market is maintainedThe U.K. is not an island and is entirely reliant on its close neighbors for its pulling share in the market”.

Last month, David Cameron and Angela Merkel, who is the German Chancellor, met to negotiate the possibility of a free trade agreement between the United States and the European Union during the World Economic Forum. Statistically, this could add 50 million pounds to the European Union economy.

Although Conti remained very factual and consistent in her WWD article about this current debacle, I still remain confused about the current situation between Britain and the European Union. I can see both sides, but personally, I support Britain remaining a part of the EU; especially with the possibility of the free-trade agreement with the United States. What are your thoughts? Can anyone add any additional facts or readings that they have come across regarding this issue?